|
- UID
- 12177
- 帖子
- 4725
- 精华
- 17
- 性别
- 男
- 注册时间
- 2008-3-8
访问个人博客
|
8楼
发表于 2010-5-19 03:28
| 只看该作者
本帖最后由 kemingqian 于 2010-5-19 04:40 编辑
 Christine Pelton has become something of a national hero. (CBS)
 Piper High School (CBS)
[url=]Previous slide[/url] [url=]Next slide[/url]
 Interactive How Honest Are You? Would you give back $120,000 that fell off a bank truck?
(CBS) 电台【48小时】报道
This is a story about a teacher who sacrificed her career when she took a moral stand against cheating; about the school board that overruled her; and about a town that was torn apart by that decision. Bill Lagattuta reports.
At the center of this storm is Christine Pelton, a teacher at Piper High School, in Piper, Kansas. She wouldn’t let her students get away with cheating.
“I hold my kids to high expectations. And I’m not lowering my expectations for these kids,” she says.
The saga started with an assignment known simply as the “Leaf Project.” Students in Pelton’s biology classes at Piper High were to collect samples from 20 different local trees, take measurements, give an oral presentation and write an extensive report.
The project was worth half the final biology grade.
Pelton was so adamant about honesty that she made her students - and their parents - sign a contract.
Rule number seven couldn’t be clearer: “Cheating and plagiarism will result in the failure of the assignment. It is expected that all work turned in is completely their own.”
What is plagiarism, to Pelton? “It is copying things word for word and using it as your own material.”
But as students started handing in their reports, Pelton says she started seeing sentences and phrases that didn’t sound like something her students would come up with on their own. She reads one example: “The box elder is intermediate in its intolerance.”
“If I asked them ‘What does that mean?’ they’ll go, ‘I don’t know.’” She says. She turned to Turnitin.com, a new Web service that compares student papers to worldwide databases. The verdict: 28 of her students - nearly one quarter of the entire sophomore class – had plagiarized.
Of the 28, only one would talk to 48 Hours, and his parents didn’t want his name used. “I was kind of upset ‘cause I was pretty sure I did’t do it,” he says, claiming he copied from the Internet but didn’t plagiarize.
“I put that as two different sentences,” he says. “So it’s not like I copied it straight from the Web site. I changed it into two different sentences.”
The students won the backing of their parents. “The problem in her classroom wasn’t with the students, but with the teacher,” says one parent.
“Plagiarism is black on this side, white on this side, with a whole lotta gray in the middle,” said another parent.
The parents were so upset that they went to the school board and demanded the teacher be overruled. In an unprecedented move, the board agreed. It made the Leaf Project count for much less of the total grade. All the kids who failed the class for cheating, would now pass.
Pelton says her authority had been completely undermined, “taken away in a moment’s decision, it was just wiped away.” Her students now knew that her word was no longer law, as long as it could be reversed by the school board.
“I knew I couldn’t teach,” she says. “I left at noon and didn’t come back. I resigned. ”
Pelton, has become something of a national hero for standing by her principles, but at Piper High, the scandal has tarnished guilty and innocent alike.
“We don’t like to say what school we go to, maybe. Or what class we’re in,” says student Laura Johnson, “because we’re looked at as we’re cheaters, but we’re really not.”
Johnson is just one of the majority of students who didn’t cheat and actually earned their grades. She originally got 101 percent. But when the school board gave into pressure from parents and made the Leaf Project count for less, Laura’s grade was lowered, while the grades of the students accused of plagiarism went up.
Mathew Whitmore, head of the English department at Edison High School in Huntington Beach, Calif., says that while the Internet makes it easier to cheat, it also makes it easier to get caught.
At his school, where intellectual theft is not tolerated, teachers routinely police their students’ work using Turnitin.com, the anti-plagiarism site that Pelton used.
He tells of one student who lifted material from eight different Web sites for one assignment, and of another who turned in verse from Shakespeare as an original love poem.
Not only are students using the Internet to cut, paste and plagiarize, Whitmore says, they also are visiting cheating sites and downloading high-tech tools like so-called magic labels.
On that site, students find 20-ounce Coke bottle labels with blank space where the ingredients usually are listed. Students can type test answers in this space, paste the label on their bottles and keep the bottles on their desks during an exam.
“It probably sounds twisted, but I would say that in this day and age, cheating is almost not wrong. Because it’s any way that you can get an advantage,” says a 17-year-old high school senior who has an almost perfect grade-point average. He spoke only if his name was not used.
Ironically, he says cheating is most prevalent among the smartest students “because they have to get that four point whatever to get into your Ivy League school. I’ve always been told you have to go to the best college you can, you have to go to the Ivy League to succeed in life. If I can get the advantage by doing this, why not?”
Pelton is no longer teaching, a high price she has paid for her principles. But she is opening a day-care business in her home.
According to some of the parents of the students she failed, Pelton missed a "teachable moment."
“She’s uncovered plagiarism,” says a parent. “That’s great, that’s wonderful, let’s give her an attaboy. Let’s stop, put on a seminar, teach these kids exactly what plagiarism is, how to avoid it, and then let them take their new knowledge, go back, and rework their projects and resubmit them. They missed their teachable moment; I truly believe that.”
Pelton sees it differently.
“No, I don’t think I missed a teachable moment. I think the Board of Education missed a teachable moment: Teaching that doing the right thing is the right thing to do."
-----------------------------------------
美国【人物】杂志报道
Cheat WaveBy Richard Jerome
School Officials Let Plagiarists Off Easy, So Teacher Christine Pelton Quit—Sending Her Town into a Tizzy
Two years ago Christine Pelton, a biology teacher at Piper High School in Piper, Kans., suspected that a few students had cheated on a major assignment. And so last year she was sure to emphasize a policy requiring both students and their parents to sign a document acknowledging that anyone who plagiarized would receive a zero for the project. "I made a big point of telling them this would cause them to fail," says Pelton, 27. "I gave them ample warning."
It would seem so. Nonetheless, when her 118 sophomores turned in their assignment—they were to collect 20 leaves and describe their characteristics and origins—Pelton, by checking Web sites and textbooks, discovered that 28 students had plagiarized. True to her word, she said she planned to give them no credit for the assignment, which was to count for half of that semester's grade.
After that all heck broke loose. Parents, outraged when Pelton stuck to her guns, rose up in protest, sparking an ongoing scandal that has divided the town, pitted teachers against the local school board and brought national notoriety to this small community on the outskirts of Kansas City, Kans. Pelton has resigned in protest, and by May 15 nine of her 37 colleagues had followed suit.
At the heart of the matter is a raging debate over academic dishonesty. When the cheating was discovered, Pelton, backed by the principal and district superintendent, offered offenders a chance to boost their zeros with an alternative project. They were not enthused—nor were their parents. "I would get calls at 2 a.m.," says Pelton, "from people calling me 'bitch.'"
Then came the Dec. 11 meeting of Piper's school board, where several angry parents spoke out against the young teacher. "C'mon, how many ways can you write, 'The oak tree lives to be 200 to 500 years old?'" asks one mother, who declines to be identified. "We weren't asking for A's and a lollipop. We just wanted to be heard."
That they were. The board ruled the project would count for only 30 percent of the grade and that students would get credit for any unplagiarized portions. Pelton taught two sections the next morning. "The kids were all whooping and hollering," she says, "saying, 'We won! We don't have to listen to teachers anymore!'" At lunch Pelton called her husband, John, 29, a video duplication supervisor, and announced she was quitting. Along with the nine teachers, principal Mike Adams and vice-principal Terry Gerstenberger have also left. "I won't say this is why I resigned," says Adams. "But it's difficult to be an administrator if you don't have support above you."
Now pro-Pelton parents are circulating a petition to oust three school-board members. Meanwhile the school has a smudged reputation. At March's state basketball playoffs, Piper's rivals held up signs that read, "Cheaters." A proctor supervising a recent SAT session warned a girl in a Piper High T-shirt that he would be watching her. Kansas State University's deans wrote the school board cautioning that Piper grads must "buy into" the university's honor code. Says language-arts teacher Leona Sigwig, who remained at the school: "It's going to affect student loans and scholarships for years."
The Piper flap has drawn renewed attention to the prevalence of cheating nationwide. According to a recent study of 4, 471 U.S. high school students by Rutgers University management professor Donald McCabe, more than half lifted sentences and paragraphs from Web sites last year, while 15 percent turned in papers copied entirely from the Internet. The scandal has also raised questions about how far parents should go to shield children from the consequences of their actions. "They're not giving kids the opportunity to learn responsibility," says Rebecca Jacobs, 40, whose 17-year-old son Kyle aced Pelton's leaf project last year—without cribbing. "In the real world Mommy and Daddy aren't going to be there."
Still, many of Pelton's ex-students insist they got a raw deal. "I failed last semester because of this," says Jamie Wright, 16, who claims she copied "maybe a sentence or two. But I didn't know it was plagiarism."
As for Pelton, she says she had no idea she would unleash such a tempest. The daughter of Mike, 50, a farmer, and Cathy, 47, a secretary, she hopes to return to teaching, her lifelong ambition. Pelton has received letters from supporters all over the world, including a fifth-grade class in New Hampshire. "They said, 'Thanks for standing up against cheating'—only some of them spelled it 'cheering,'" she says. "So I guess I'm still affecting kids, even if I'm not in the classroom."
Richard Jerome
Pam Grout in Piper
|
|
发表于 2010-5-18 13:09
| 
